<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Craig W. Wright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Musing and observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:12:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Global Climate Scam by plm137</title>
		<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/the-global-climate-scam/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>plm137</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/?p=2612#comment-188</guid>
		<description>The true data was there all the time.  It only had to be made available.  The data results were &quot;inverted&quot; and anyone who would have had the chance to actually see the raw data would have seen this at once.  Even an untrained person could have figured it out.  

For several years now I have tried to get the ray data used when making the &quot;global warming&quot; crisis theory.  I could never get it.

If you look at the graphs presented by Al Gore and reversed the legens so CO2 and temperature were reversed, then you have the true facts.  This information came out of England several years ago, but it never made the news (surprise, supprise).

No conputer errors here - it was intentional missinformation from the highest level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The true data was there all the time.  It only had to be made available.  The data results were &#8220;inverted&#8221; and anyone who would have had the chance to actually see the raw data would have seen this at once.  Even an untrained person could have figured it out.  </p>
<p>For several years now I have tried to get the ray data used when making the &#8220;global warming&#8221; crisis theory.  I could never get it.</p>
<p>If you look at the graphs presented by Al Gore and reversed the legens so CO2 and temperature were reversed, then you have the true facts.  This information came out of England several years ago, but it never made the news (surprise, supprise).</p>
<p>No conputer errors here &#8211; it was intentional missinformation from the highest level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Global Climate Scam by Week in review &#171; Craig W. Wright</title>
		<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/the-global-climate-scam/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Week in review &#171; Craig W. Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/?p=2612#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...] Photos      &#171; Remote Desktop Lockup/Freeze on&#160;Login The Global Climate&#160;Scam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photos      &laquo; Remote Desktop Lockup/Freeze on&nbsp;Login The Global Climate&nbsp;Scam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week in review by Week in review ZB BU online</title>
		<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/week-in-review-76/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Week in review ZB BU online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/?p=2227#comment-179</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post: Week in review          By admin &#124; category: Uncategorized &#124; tags: chances, growing-economy, heart, imperial, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post: Week in review          By admin | category: Uncategorized | tags: chances, growing-economy, heart, imperial, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by kungfucraig</title>
		<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/about/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>kungfucraig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-170</guid>
		<description>I need a little more information about your group. Who are you? What is your purpose? I have looked at your website and still have not gleaned that much. Otherwise I would be happy to mention you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need a little more information about your group. Who are you? What is your purpose? I have looked at your website and still have not gleaned that much. Otherwise I would be happy to mention you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by julio</title>
		<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/about/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>julio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-169</guid>
		<description>im a C4L member, Craig, can you do a writ-up on this.....hust lauched and picking up good steam locally............site is at: SonsOfLibertyRiders.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im a C4L member, Craig, can you do a writ-up on this&#8230;..hust lauched and picking up good steam locally&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;site is at: SonsOfLibertyRiders.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Of Third Party Payer Systems by rob stehlin</title>
		<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/of-third-party-payer-systems/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>rob stehlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/?p=2119#comment-168</guid>
		<description>how about &quot;Cash For Doctors&quot;  - screw the cars, lets get healthy.  Just maybe would could fix health care.  The money is wasted on the small bills (processing and wasted over use) up to the tune of 400 billion per year.  Americans need to start paying cash to doctors and we could fix this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about &#8220;Cash For Doctors&#8221;  &#8211; screw the cars, lets get healthy.  Just maybe would could fix health care.  The money is wasted on the small bills (processing and wasted over use) up to the tune of 400 billion per year.  Americans need to start paying cash to doctors and we could fix this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Of Third Party Payer Systems by Week in review &#171; Craig W. Wright</title>
		<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/of-third-party-payer-systems/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Week in review &#171; Craig W. Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/?p=2119#comment-167</guid>
		<description>[...] Panoramio Photos      &#171; Of Third Party Payer&#160;Systems [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panoramio Photos      &laquo; Of Third Party Payer&nbsp;Systems [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Teachable Moment at the Dingell Romulus Town Hall Meeting by Jim Babka</title>
		<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/2009/08/08/a-teachable-moment-at-the-dingell-romulus-town-hall-meeting/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Babka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/?p=1999#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Harry Browne would&#039;ve thought that was good, but would&#039;ve encouraged you to do something even harder, explain to her how getting that &quot;right to health care&quot; would hurt her, the ones she loved, and others. 

He would&#039;ve encouraged you to explain to her what was possible, and in this instance, what used to be the case in America, when people were hurting... the doctors made house calls, the charitable hospitals served people in need. It is due to government involvement in health care that there are few, if any plans that cater to someone with a particular condition. They can&#039;t because of mandated coverage, allegedly imposed out of a sense of compassion.  

And it&#039;s always people that help. When government gets involved, it&#039;s always much more expensive to get people to help because the politicians and bureaucrats take such a large cut off the top. 

BTW, you&#039;re mentioned in today&#039;s Downsizer-Dispatch. Thanks for endorsing the Read the Bills Act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Browne would&#8217;ve thought that was good, but would&#8217;ve encouraged you to do something even harder, explain to her how getting that &#8220;right to health care&#8221; would hurt her, the ones she loved, and others. </p>
<p>He would&#8217;ve encouraged you to explain to her what was possible, and in this instance, what used to be the case in America, when people were hurting&#8230; the doctors made house calls, the charitable hospitals served people in need. It is due to government involvement in health care that there are few, if any plans that cater to someone with a particular condition. They can&#8217;t because of mandated coverage, allegedly imposed out of a sense of compassion.  </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s always people that help. When government gets involved, it&#8217;s always much more expensive to get people to help because the politicians and bureaucrats take such a large cut off the top. </p>
<p>BTW, you&#8217;re mentioned in today&#8217;s Downsizer-Dispatch. Thanks for endorsing the Read the Bills Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week in review by kungfucraig</title>
		<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/2009/06/20/week-in-review-62/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>kungfucraig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/?p=1704#comment-128</guid>
		<description>I have several arguments against national health care:

1. It is unconstitutional. Practically this doesn&#039;t really matter though because the Constitution is a dead letter, more or less.

2. It&#039;s immoral. In order to pay for this the state will be required to take in taxes from others. Simply, my right to the fruits of my labors trumps any supposed right you or anyone else has to health care.

3. The Federal Government has a track record of ruining everything in which it gets involved. The skewls should be proof enough of that.

4. The country is already bankrupt. We can not possibly pay for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have several arguments against national health care:</p>
<p>1. It is unconstitutional. Practically this doesn&#8217;t really matter though because the Constitution is a dead letter, more or less.</p>
<p>2. It&#8217;s immoral. In order to pay for this the state will be required to take in taxes from others. Simply, my right to the fruits of my labors trumps any supposed right you or anyone else has to health care.</p>
<p>3. The Federal Government has a track record of ruining everything in which it gets involved. The skewls should be proof enough of that.</p>
<p>4. The country is already bankrupt. We can not possibly pay for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week in review by Mukund Rajamony</title>
		<link>http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/2009/06/20/week-in-review-62/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Mukund Rajamony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigwwright.wordpress.com/?p=1704#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I am a bit confused with the article on socialized medicine. I tend to lean towards a national system of medical care because I do look at medicine more from a humanitarian perspective rather than a roaring business.

When a doctor shells out more than a 100k to complete his medical education, he is bound to extract the maximum possible from his patients. It appears ridiculous that the extraction has gone to an extent that there are probably very few or no providers available in the market who can provide a zero copay for clinical visits! Additionally, what kind of an insurance system is one in which you have to subscribe but procedures won&#039;t be covered for the first 6 months? What is my premium for 6 months for?

After all the hefty premium being charged it takes 10 hours for a patient to be seen in the ER after being triaged! Ridiculous and worse, the nurse won&#039;t even tell you what approximate time you may be called in. So if you are alone, there&#039;s no food for you too!

A single payer system (the government) is a good idea. The government is responsible for your treatment and will lose its mandate in the next elections when it doesn&#039;t deliver its services appropriately. It is not so easy with a private insurance system.

I read this page ( http://transgriot.blogspot.com/2009/06/10-busted-myths-about-canadian.html) after reading some data about Canada. Of course, it is all too confusing. But the doctor doesn&#039;t have to pay a person to call insurance companies.

&quot;Socialized medicine&quot; or &quot;single-payer insurance&quot; should eventually lead to a no-insurance system where everything should be available and affordable. Of course, the avaialbility in the countryside versus the city may still be a burning question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a bit confused with the article on socialized medicine. I tend to lean towards a national system of medical care because I do look at medicine more from a humanitarian perspective rather than a roaring business.</p>
<p>When a doctor shells out more than a 100k to complete his medical education, he is bound to extract the maximum possible from his patients. It appears ridiculous that the extraction has gone to an extent that there are probably very few or no providers available in the market who can provide a zero copay for clinical visits! Additionally, what kind of an insurance system is one in which you have to subscribe but procedures won&#8217;t be covered for the first 6 months? What is my premium for 6 months for?</p>
<p>After all the hefty premium being charged it takes 10 hours for a patient to be seen in the ER after being triaged! Ridiculous and worse, the nurse won&#8217;t even tell you what approximate time you may be called in. So if you are alone, there&#8217;s no food for you too!</p>
<p>A single payer system (the government) is a good idea. The government is responsible for your treatment and will lose its mandate in the next elections when it doesn&#8217;t deliver its services appropriately. It is not so easy with a private insurance system.</p>
<p>I read this page ( <a href="http://transgriot.blogspot.com/2009/06/10-busted-myths-about-canadian.html)" rel="nofollow">http://transgriot.blogspot.com/2009/06/10-busted-myths-about-canadian.html)</a> after reading some data about Canada. Of course, it is all too confusing. But the doctor doesn&#8217;t have to pay a person to call insurance companies.</p>
<p>&#8220;Socialized medicine&#8221; or &#8220;single-payer insurance&#8221; should eventually lead to a no-insurance system where everything should be available and affordable. Of course, the avaialbility in the countryside versus the city may still be a burning question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
